Martijn Visser

Additionally now we get `extensiondriver("/my/file.tif") == "LIBERTIFF"`. But that has to do with the `extensions` function that doesn't consider multiple drivers may support the same extension. In this case we...

Maybe we should just skip LIBERTIFF in the extensions loop over all drivers for now? EDIT: Done in #476.

The last driver for eacht ext is picked. I left out ndriver = 1 since there is no issue there. In 7419f87d77a11aa951f8bbd0570b846a2e41485d I now add overrides to ensure the right...

Duplicate of #586. I see you have `JULIA_NUM_THREADS = 8`, could you try `JULIA_NUM_THREADS = 8,1`? See https://github.com/JuliaPy/PythonCall.jl/issues/586#issuecomment-2971656080.

> Might be good to detail what those mean, and how that would map to Ribasim actions here. Cases, scenarios and measures / measurement actions all map to the cases...

Yeah this would be nice to have. The Python docstrings are still quite minimal and don't include node setup: https://ribasim.org/reference/python/ I guess we could add docstrings to the node type...

If we don't use the precompile file in PackageCompiler, the build is 6 minutes faster and only 6 MB smaller (than 313 MB) but the latency is about twice as...

I think #2091 would help here. Although benchmarking #2077 did not seem to make much of a difference, so it is probably not enough. Rather than focusing on precompilation we...

We can also try using `--trace-compile=file.jl --trace-compile-timing` on 1.12 (the 1.12-nightly juliaup channel). I tried this but no file.jl was created. ``` julia --project -m Ribasim generated_testmodels\basic\ribasim.toml julia --project --trace-compile=file.jl...

The top post showed around 20 seconds latency on v2024.11, on v2025.4 that has unfortunately gone up to 30 seconds. ``` ❯ hyperfine 'ribasim ribasim.toml' Benchmark 1: ribasim ribasim.toml Time...