Vincent Arel-Bundock

Thanks. This seems reasonable.

`future` is probably a better platform for cross-platform parallel computation: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/future/index.html The examples in this thread are probably all too small (OLS with N=32), so the parallel overhead is heavier...

You're right. `boot` is kind of a nightmare to learn.

My (controversial) view: This will add code complexity and convey little information (literally 0s and dots). I understand why we may want to add empty rows for presentation purposes in...

Haha, yeah, sorry. I guess I always only ever use/see the markdown in console, so I lost sight ;)

Unsollicited opinion, but I’m starting to worry a lot about feature and argument sprawl in the `easystats` packages. Documentation is already hard to read because there are so many options...

Thanks! The vignettes I linked to above compare adjusted predictions and marginal means explicitly to `emmeans`, so I know those can be replicated and are already covered by `modelbased`. Focusing...

That's super useful, thanks! Maybe there's no value for you after all. Frankly, it is beginning to sound like I should have done more market research before jumping into this...

> The average marginal effect should just be one number, the “average overall one and only effect to rule them all”, or something like this. Looking at splines, it seems...

The plot above appears to be mislabeled. It should be: "Marginal effect of Petal.Length on Sepal.Width"