Vincent Arel-Bundock

Don't think we need to get bogged down in a debate over Average Marginal Effects. This is really a trivial issue. The only meaningful difference is that `emmeans` and `marginaleffects`...

> This is probably more a long-term goal, but given the possibly more light weight character of your package, I would say we should keep this issue open and investigate...

> Many potential evolutions could be considered to avoid too many duplication and to pool maintaining efforts > > * sharing some common core low-level set of functions (via insight?)...

Sorry to revive a dead thread, but I wrote this above: > Sounds good. I can also ping you if/when the promise of more supported models gets realized. I'm gearing...

> Can you remind me the input we need here? Inputs: * `model` object such as the output of `MASS::polr()` * `type` string which is accept as an argument for...

> Here is a simple formulation of the delta method (modified from `msm::deltamethod()`): Very cool!

I don't know these models well enough to be confident, but I notice that the 3 `rstantools` calls all use the same arguments. So perhaps we could use checks such...

Right now, `marginaleffects` can only do pairwise contrasts. I've been more focused on slopes, but plan to turn my attention to contrasts as soon as possible. I am optimistic about...

I don't have much to add to the discussion but was led here from the other thread, and wanted to react to: > all in all, it sounds like a...

Thanks for the fix! (I don't know why I'm still surprised/impressed by your efficiency, but I am...) Your question about `find_response` is a very good one. The list option would...