Unnawut Leepaisalsuwanna

@souradeep-das Is this ready for another review?

Adding `upgrade path required` label so we can collect them up and inform infra/users easily of manual upgrade tasks needed.

> @unnawut do we need to update any env vars? Yeah the ones you have in the infra PR should suffice

> Do we need a successive change for the change in API endpoint? @InoMurko @unnawut @T-Dnzt @T-Dnzt @achiurizo I think we should get a thumbs up from either of you...

> IMHO there is no link between #1257 and this #1274, info’s get_utxos and security’s get_exitable_utxo are different endpoints Ah sorry I didn't put why I thought they're related. Yup...

Pasting my inputs from slack: > From user perspective I can think of 2 opposite user groups that relate to this: > > 1. Exchanges and enterprises: They’ll have addresses...

@InoMurko Thanks for the summary! 💪 The summary looks good to me. While the 3rd option research is happening, I can explore the 4th option from usage side. So some...

Also open to discussion if this belongs in Info API

> Are we're aiming for this to read, that events are just events that "somehow" relate to the UTXO in question, and it is on the client's (using the data...

> Assuming you mean plasma transaction by 'transfer event', bear in mind a plasma transaction is the only entity in watcher with no actual corresponding with eth txn hash. Blocks...