Tony Jin

Thanks for the request. We'll consider this feature during planning.

Thanks for the request. We'll consider this feature during planning.

Hey @danielrhodes we're in the middle of some tech debt/cleanup work and will get to this + related performance enhancements later on in the quarter. I'd expect some updates in...

This is related to https://github.com/box/box-content-preview/issues/521. Currently we need the location of preview.js since we depend on third party assets (e.g. viewer assets like pdf.js, shaka-player.js, etc.). That combined with not...

Thanks for the report! We'll take a look.

@apat183 could you describe your use case a bit more? If you're interested in annotations on documents, we (at Box) are working on a solution, assuming you're okay with having...

We aren't doing active development on this project.

Hey @kc980602 thanks for the report. We'll add these as known issues to our documentation and resolve in a future release.

Thank you for the detailed report! We'll take a look.

Thanks for following up @pioug! Does upgrading to v1.5.0 fix your problem @coooo77?