Tony Arcieri
Tony Arcieri
@gildub the changes you are proposing are, at best, off-topic for this PR. Please open a separate issue.
@bxf12315 it should run automatically from now on
So yeah, this PR includes many, many breaking changes by decomposing what are currently inherent methods into traits. That's not necessarily a dealbreaker for this PR but it will signal...
@bxf12315 I will try to review soon, however I am the maintainer for a large number of projects and this PR is something of a lower priority to me
I'm a little confused how referencing `std` didn't break CI
Yeah, our dependencies have adopted a more aggressive set of MSRV policies so we'll need to follow suit. I'm not sure it makes sense to even advertise a static MSRV...
> the sparse API that @amousset has built that is hosted on Github Pages. I wasn't aware of this? Where is the index?
I am unfortunately not a Windows user, though that's not to say we don't care about Windows support. It would be good if someone who regularly develops on Windows can...
As things stand the current `tame-index` requirement in the `rustsec` crate is unsatisfiable and that's breaking CI. To the extent some parts of it pass is only because the yanked...
Can we roll back? The other changes would remain in git history and could be used as the basis of the branch to fully upgrade.