Tamir Duberstein
Tamir Duberstein
Looks like there's some code in libbpf that tries to get this right. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/3f01e9fed8454dcd89727016c3e5b2fbb8f8e50c/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c#L21-L101
There's also this fun detail: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/a256aac5b7000bdf1232ed2bbd674582c0ab27ec TL;DR kernel 4.19.x where x >= 222 lies but it's not clear that all facilities report the same version.
Any movement on this?
+1 having the same issues.
Thanks. Unfortunately it seems that I need to write the parser, still? That's kind of what I was hoping to avoid :(
Yeah - one test at a time is great (though you may need to do a bit of buffering to address #45). On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 9:37 AM,...
FWIW you might be able to use [`collections.abc.Awaitable`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html#collections.abc.Awaitable) instead of `asyncio.Future`.
Ping. Can we merge this please?
It's more important that #17230 is acknowledged certainly. Apologies for the nuisance.
There's a further bug here which I originally (incorrectly) reported as https://github.com/python/typeshed/issues/11849. This code runs fine: ```python class MyDT(datetime): pass my_dt = MyDT.now() assert type(my_dt) == MyDT ``` This code...