David Harris

I've got significant concerns with this proposal as lots of people are still using Java 8. Take this example from the State of the JVM survey Synk published last year...

@sunix as mentioned - last year, the one for this year is currently running and I will be keeping an eye on it. I'm willing to bet Java 8 still...

Note - this may be working as designed with the AZ CLI.

(apologies, for some reason GitHub was failing to convert tasks to issues so the formatting is a bit odd)

flux-system namespace **OpenShift:** k describe ns flux-system Name: flux-system Labels: kubernetes.io/metadata.name=flux-system Annotations: openshift.io/sa.scc.mcs: s0:c25,c0 openshift.io/sa.scc.supplemental-groups: 1000600000/10000 openshift.io/sa.scc.uid-range: 1000600000/10000 Status: Active **Kind** k describe ns flux-system Name: flux-system Labels: app.kubernetes.io/instance=flux-system app.kubernetes.io/part-of=flux...

Closing in favour of the fix in the operator

Re-opening to cover a fallback of using flux-system cc @ozamosi

@JamWils still an issue. We should add guidance on this matter. The referenced PR was a tmp fix to address issues in `0.8.0` only

Somewhat relevant issue for consideration https://github.com/weaveworks/weave-gitops/issues/2115

fair point, I see how that would increase complexity and in which case @JamWils would need to weigh in on priority order. My suggestion would be github.com > gitlab.com ~>...