Results 408 comments of Sebastian Wick

The change seems fine to me but I'd like @ebassi opinion on it.

Added some explanation and ascii art showing the session bus setup.

This seems fine in general but maybe explicitly list all the methods/props/signals that should become available in case dbus later gets some feature that we really shouldn't expose to sandboxes.

I'm a bit on the fence about the approach. Wouldn't it be better to move the code we currently have in `xdp_app_info_foo_new` to `xdp_app_info_foo_initable_init` and only have the pid and...

> That was my original approach, but it got pretty spectacularly messy and I just settled for these construct-only properties. Mh, I couldn't resist and tried it as well. The...

Not going to block this or anything, but I just don't see how GObject properties are better for this at all. They have huge overhead (string comparisons, GValue packing and...

Enabling pytest and disabling tests results in pytest being disabled as well...