Denis Varlakov

I'm waiting for `secp256k1` library update too that will bump `rand` dependency 🙂 This will happen eventually. Regarding `pairing-plus` issue, I believe we can eliminate this one by slightly modifying...

Hi @dlhex, yes, tss scheme implemented in `multi-party-ecdsa` can be generic over choice of curve, particularly it used to support p256. It just requires to make algorithms, defined in this...

Hi @eatruffle, what are exact commands you executed that produce the error?

Confirm, it reproduces for me with some probability. Not sure what's exact problem. cc @elichai @MatanHamilis

Thanks, @Sky-Nik, you impressively covered the question! @drewstone Indeed, what you need in order to carry out the protocol is methods of [StateMachine trait] only. Workflow looks like: 1. If...

> `message_queue` keeps on increasing by one message in each round. Hi @dev0x1, do you delete messege from the queue after you sent it? State machine only adds messages to...

You're right, it's not obvious from documentation that messages need to be deleted from the queue. I updated [`.message_queue` method](https://docs.rs/round-based/0.1.6/round_based/trait.StateMachine.html#tymethod.message_queue) documentation

> The test will fail. Am I misunderstanding the expected behavior or is this a bug? [`.wants_to_proceed()`] indicates whether `StateMachine` wants to do some expensive computation. `handle_incoming` actually may jump...

> for people that need to interact with the state machine(s) directly? @tmpfs, could you describe your case, why do you need to work with it directly? Asking because next...

@tmpfs does web assembly prevents you from using `async` code? I'm not saying you have to implement delivery logic within `Stream`/`Sink`, you can just use [`UnboundedReceiver`]/[`UnboundedSender`] and feed them messages...