stap-m
stap-m
> > @stap-m : I think, the first part (adapting `electricity generation process` and `heat generation process`) can be implemented immediately, right? > > Just stumbled upon this issue now...
We should still try to axiomatize the spatial difference between input and output for `energy transfer`.
We may consider out `energy transfer function` and `energy transformation function`.
Since the descriptor annotation is requested for in https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/oeplatform/issues/1718 again, and there is an agreement on that in https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/oekg/issues/19, I will add this annotation now, so that it can be...
> * [x] Clean RO annotations: move OEO-made annotations on RO relations into oeo-import-edits (many of them are stored in oeo-shared) Taking care of this now.
Seems to be solved.
Thanks for the proposals. In general, I agree. > To me, every industrial process has at least energy transformations and material transformations as subprocesses. So I suggest the following redefinition:...
> However, these axioms do not yet reflect that it is the _same_ type of matter. @OpenEnergyPlatform/oeo-general-expert-formal-ontology : Any ideas how to axiomatise that it is the same type of...
> Those axioms are already implemented. > > However, the following question from @Alex2448 is still open: > > > Also, how can we axiomatise somehow, that `absorption` and `desorption`...