stap-m
stap-m
Reads good! Thank you for extending the sources.
Is this a good issue for a dev meeting?
> - it looks like the (unusual) decision to pun `owl:equivalentClass` as an annotation property was revoked and the (imprecise and non-standard) IAO:0006011 is now used > Discussion in oeo-dev-79:...
> Also it seems like I made a mistake and branched from my last feature (the small correction in the PR template) instead of from dev. I could use git...
> Could you please let me know if this is what you had in mind? If not I'd like to correct my mistakes before I implement the other tasks Yes,...
I have two general remarks: 1. I am wondering for all these cases with the long labels, whether the definitions would read more smoothly if they started with "A" (indefinite...
> @stap-m I don't think the lables necessarily sound like processes but their length is very uncomfortable. It sounds more like a sentence than a name. If I had not...
@madbkr I'll review again. I'd suggest that all open questions should be part of a second PR. Could you include them into the todo list please?
@madbkr please check my following suggestions. Did you already update the changelog after changing the labels? I'll marked some more stuff as todo for the next PR. I prefer to...
I created a PR with a new annotation and added the annotation to all classes that we wanted as study descriptors so far, see https://github.com/OpenEnergyPlatform/oekg/issues/19.