Sebastian Schuberth

Closing in favor of https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/11225.

> @sschuberth GitHub complains that @bs-ondem does not have write access to the repository, should we just remove the entry for `/**/*Sw360*`? Yes, I think it's fine to not have...

Could you maybe attach the analyzer result, license choice config etc. also to the issue for a quicker reproducer?

Thanks. PS: You can also really attach files for download by dragging & dropping them into the comment field.

@fviernau could you spend the time to try reproducing this?

There's a change this might have been fixed with https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/11101. Can anyone retry?

I would like also @mnonnenmacher to comment one this one, but he's on vacation this week.

In any case, I wonder where these local changes come from: ``` error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout: packages/babel-plugin-transform-async-to-generator/test/fixtures/async-to-generator/async-arrow-in-method/actual.js packages/babel-plugin-transform-async-to-generator/test/fixtures/async-to-generator/object-method-with-arrows/actual.js packages/babel-plugin-transform-async-to-generator/test/fixtures/async-to-generator/object-method-with-arrows/expected.js ``` Any...

> I have seen that you have an open issue [#9717](https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/issues/9717) concerning Cargo - could that be a reason? I don't think so, that issue is more about the number...

> [@sschuberth](https://github.com/sschuberth): Is there any other thing I can do? Well, I guess you could try looking into #9717 still, to see if resolving that helps you as well. Other...