Sebastian Schuberth

> Hi @sschuberth, I saw the funTest-external-tools failure but can’t tell which part is caused by my changes. Could you guide me? The failure(s) is / are unrelated to your...

Maybe it'd be better to record the tool version as part of `ProjectAnalyzerResult`, as some package managers theoretically could use different tool versions per project, like Node projects with corepack...

As a side note, my (current) favorite Linux distribution, [Fedora, is moving to Forgejo](https://www.phoronix.com/news/Fedora-Forge) as well, probably giving it some traction in general. Also, Berlin-based [CodeBerg](https://codeberg.org/) is a popular Forgejo...

Generally, as briefly mentioned in today's TSC meeting, the growing number of integrations we have for ORT makes me think whether we should move all integration into a separate GitHub...

> I agree, I find it much cleaner to have the enabled flags as part of the package manager configuration instead of the separate properties. Well, that was your proposal......

> Does this mean `enabledByDefault` will be removed? (Or should `enabledByDefault` be the default value?) It *was* already removed by 6b507da1e9f6b3c47b8af451376534b4c7562e3c / 81824eadba855f57f2cc9ac0fbdbe1addc9a0b73.

> What is the current state on this? See the "This branch has conflicts that must be resolved" hint below. We agreed in one of the recent [community meetings](https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/wiki/ORT-Weekly-Meeting) (Which...

Closing in favor of https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/11225.

> Is it possible to scan coda packages? Not directly, [ORT has no support for Conda](https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/issues/1534) yet.

I don't think that you actually gain much with using ORT at all here, firstly due to the current lack of Conda ecosystem support, and secondly because a / that...