Sebastian Schuberth

@MarcelBochtler what's the latest status here, I believe you got it running? Also @hendrikebbers recently told me that he got it working, but apparently we miss to publish ARM Docker...

Commit message title: According to conventional commits, the title should start with `feat(scanner):`.

> detekt found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the [Files changed](/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/10631/files) tab for more details. @Prakash-Mishra-9ghz, please have a look at these issues and make...

@Prakash-Mishra-9ghz we have a policy to fix any issues identified during review / by automated checks in the actual commit that introduces the issue as long as the PR is...

> The CI failed due to this not being in the **NOTICE** file. Should I add myself there, or just remove the header? You should add yourself to the [NOTICE](https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/blob/main/NOTICE)...

> hi @sschuberth could you help me to figure out the **funtest-docker, test(unbuntu and windows) fail.** Those are temporary failures due to https://github.com/foojayio/discoapi/issues/124, which had been fixed, but now is...

> Just rebase your PR onto latest `main` in a few hours to check. Will you do that rebase, @Prakash-Mishra-9ghz?

> @sschuberth CI is failing due to an sbt-assembly version mismatch—could you confirm if it is related to PR? No, it should not be related, I've retriggered the test.

Please see my comment [over here](https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort/pull/10764#issuecomment-3234124669): This implementation lacks functional tests that make use of the scanner to prove that the implementation is working.

I see that https://github.com/fossology/fossology/releases/tag/4.6.0-rc1 by now includes the `FOSSology-nomossa` binary so this implementation could be easily tested. @Prakash-Mishra-9ghz, are you planning to continue working on this, or should we take...