Steffen Neumann
Steffen Neumann
Hi, during the discussion of #652 we realised that it makes sense to have a corresponding `DefinedTermSet` going with a profile `DefinedTerm`, which helps specifying in a FAIR manner where...
Hi, several people are representing terms from ontologies via [DefinedTerm](http://schema.org/DefinedTerm) ([example](https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/issues/594#issuecomment-1262041402) ), but I guess there are different flavors out there how exactly to do that. Hence I would like...
Hi, there has been some previous efforts to create a [BioChemicalReaction](https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/blob/d2045e8d031dde22757919d56d33b75562673876/BioChemicalReaction/RheaReaction_option2.json). Currently, there are some seemingly working examples, and a Document (`Fluxomics Bioschemas Implementation `) in someone's google drive. It...
Hi, validating a `MolecularEntity` I created I get an error in the validation with ElixirTeSS/bioschemas-validator: ``` Validating against profile MolecularEntity 0.5-RELEASE.json ... These properties names are in the metadata but...
Hi, the example `"molecularWeight": 153.181` is invalid. https://github.com/BioSchemas/bioschemas.github.io/blob/aadc8b2bd62e00b4dfff57f43a855df5e25116b9/pages/_profiles/MolecularEntity/0.5-RELEASE.html#L383 The Validator ElixirTeSS/bioschemas-validator gives ``` For property:molecularWeight , 153.181 is not valid under any of the given schemas We are expecting one...
Hi, optimizeXcmsSet$best_settings does include an $xset, while optimizeRetGroup$best_settings does not. I think the two should be consistent, or was there a reason ? Yours, Steffen
by importing https://github.com/sneumann/metaRbolomics/blob/master/connectivity/packages.Rmd as appendix. And/or run that in the preface of the book, so that the numbers are available as R variables throughout the book. Yours, Steffen
Hi, I would like to start / add something on best practices for semantic annotation of software packages. Looking especially for @egonw, but other input more than welcome. We'd need...
Some of our references were explicitly to websites. We need to have those links. Also, it would be great to have DOI or article links in the bibliography.