smartcontracts

Attempting to confirm whether or not this is against spec. Either way, we would still need to execute a balance check before and after the transfer to watch for this...

@Morito-Ikeda absolutely!

@nvonpentz @DavidKnott I definitely agree that the server should have a database. Whether or not the CLI should store state is dependent on what we want the CLI to do....

@nvonpentz > The user then checks if each of the transactions are valid by cross referencing it's own local child chain, and making sure the block hash matches the block...

Okay, here's the plan: Although the initial implementation won't be a p2p network, it makes sense to "pretend" that it's a p2p network where every client has only one peer...

I'm very much considering this! I'm going to discuss it further with a few people, but it seems like it'd be most useful to have the contracts as a truffle...

I think the easiest way to handle this is to have the transaction confirmation be included as an input to `apply_transaction`. Does that make sense?

Are you running with `--profile legacy`? If you run with `--profile current` or without the profile option then it'll try to run a Bedrock node. If you only want to...

Merged another fix that uses `aria2c`. Can you see if that works well? If it's good enough then I'll use that, otherwise will explore using a multi-threaded downloader.

I propose we override `require` to do a loop to burn the gas