smartcontracts

Very likely that this will be supported in `1.0.0`. Keeping this issue open for posterity.

Transferring to specs repo. I assume this will be included as part of Bedrock, but the specs repo is the right place to have visibility on this request, otherwise this...

There are deeper reasons for this design decision that people should be aware of. The `NUMBER` opcode was not designed as a time-keeping mechanism. `NUMBER` has a very clear purpose:...

cc @0xLaplace > do you think it can appear in the scheduled January regenesis? We don't know when the next major upgrade will take place yet. Unfortunately I can't give...

Transferring over to optimistic-specs where this will get more visibility. Current specified behavior for the Optimism Bedrock release is that blocks will be produced at a rate of 1 block...

Transferring over to specs repo. Solution would be to enforce a minimum amount of gas for deposits. I believe we should specify this for inclusion in Bedrock.

I believe this issue is better suited for optimistic-specs, going to transfer it there. It'll get more visibility on that repository, since the sort of deep protocol-level modification required to...

@ben-chain is this still something we want as part of Bedrock?

I think this might be better as a discussion on the specs repo. We have several of these sort of issues that probably belong there, so I'll tackle moving them...

Transferring over to specs repo. We realistically will not implement this within 0.5 but it makes sense to discuss as part of Bedrock.