smartcontracts

> Intuitively it seems like the command changing for the native build would be fine for our stuff, which directly calls the emscripten binaries, but I'm not positive. I think...

Looking into this!

I see that you're using `0.2.1-alpha.0`. We're making pretty big changes in `1.0.0-alpha.X`. I'm going to try running your stuff against the latest `1.0.0-alpha.X` to see if this is still...

Hmmm I ran this locally but didn't get any errors. Could you double check the reproduction steps? Maybe I'm just looking at the wrong file

Hah, no problem. Trying again now.

Ahhh okay. This is an issue I've been aware of but haven't written up a ticket for yet. You can actually get your test to pass if you swap the...

No problem! I'm going to leave this issue open as a reference + add to the 1.0 roadmap. Thank you again for the report!!

> LMK if you'd like a separate issue to support an empty `calls` array, or if this comment suffices. @maurelian could you make another issue for this? Supporting empty calls...

Can confirm that the numbers being shown on the site are off. Using the adapter we see Optimism is spending 100k:  But page only shows 30k: 

@dmihal from what I can tell, the adapter itself looks correct but the data being presented on the site seems off. Sometimes the data is correct, but other times it...