Shireen Elhabian

Agreed. We can use this issue as the parent one for the subissues.

I think so. It would be redirecting Studio to get particle updates from saved checkpoints for visualization. I think implementing this outside Studio would entail duplicate viz functionality. Other thoughts?

do you mean cloud? or if the user ran his optimization on a server? For this issue, we assume that the input is an (accessible) path where shapeworks optimize results...

No. Assume that the user has already optimized a shape model while keeping checkpoints and saving them to the shapeworks output folder (using the keep_checkpoints xml tag). This command just...

Yep. Exactly. This will also help a user who needs a hefty machine to optimize the model using batch processing (command line optimize) but also need a way to troubleshoot...

@j-void we could consider intensity-based data augmentation for DeepSSM and your work.

@jadie1 this is still relevant and can be useful when we have heterogenous intenstiy profiles (e.g. LGE), you can assign @mahimoksha to this as this is related to his augmentation...

Moving this to 6.3 but we have to finish this by December max regardless of the release date.

@akenmorris @HeavenlyBerserker Is this planned for the next release?

BeforeIteration - compute shape statistics and correspondence object gradient. We can use python for training the network and compute the correspondence gradient. @AtefehKashani Which APIs are needed from the Optimize...