Özkan Sezer

> Not a fix, but let's explicitly use ubuntu-22.04 until we know how to run them on 24.04 Yes

Unrelated, but the following happened in my fork: A one-off? ``` The following tests FAILED: 20 - testbounds (Timeout) ``` https://github.com/sezero/SDL/actions/runs/12538369780/job/34963486384

> I'm actually not getting that warning. I compile with `-Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic`, and I've tried with `-Wstringop-overflow=1/2/3/4`. Is there anything else I need to do enable that warning? Warning...

The commit in master silences the warning for me. I don't have gcc-15 yet, but I think it should be safe to change the version check from `== 14` to...

OK, great. You seem to have missed in relaxing gcc version check for pragma pop, though: ```diff --- a/dr_mp3.h +++ b/dr_mp3.h @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static void drmp3_L3_decode_scalefactors(const drmp3_uint8 *hdr,...

Why can we not embed android-ifaddrs directly (e.g. as a static implementation detail) instead of building it as a shared dependency lib? That would, I believe, eliminate the linkage errors...

Why not just port the tiny Android.mk from SDL2 branch? E.g.: ```Makefile LOCAL_PATH := $(call my-dir) include $(CLEAR_VARS) LOCAL_MODULE := SDL3_net LOCAL_C_INCLUDES := $(LOCAL_PATH)/include LOCAL_CFLAGS := LOCAL_SRC_FILES := src/SDL_net.c LOCAL_SHARED_LIBRARIES...

The cmake'ry of that library seems confused _a lot_, therefore it doesn't instill much confidence in me.. Personally I don't think that this should be accepted, at least because that...

I'm closing this. Maintainers can reopen if they think there is compelling reason to do so.

I'm axing this now