Samuel Karp

> if a future version of FreeBSD changes the names of the resources or actions, the format can be stable Is this likely? Have the resources or actions changed names...

> @samuelkarp, if you are still happy with your alternative sketch, I could make a new commit using that configuration style. I am, though I'd love to hear from others...

> Does/would runj support running linux containers? Not yet; I'm focusing on the FreeBSD userland first.

> Would runj be responsible for mounting sysfs & proc or would containerd (or other higher level abstraction) have this responsibility? runj would be responsible for performing the mount operations...

@davidchisnall See https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/5480 by @gizahNL for this :smile:

I haven't had the time to take a look at @gizahNL's moby port at all yet, so I'm not going to be a ton of help in debugging whether there's...

Looks like changing that to `uname -m` might be reasonable? Would that work properly for other Arm 32-bit architectures (I don't have any machines available to test right now)?

I'd be happy to take a PR fixing this if anyone is interested. Otherwise it'll wait until I next have an Arm machine that I'm working on.

@davidchisnall wrote: > Thanks. I'm interested (time permitting) in working on some of the network integration (vnet + pf). [Pot](https://github.com/pizzamig/pot) already seems to manage this reasonably well, so should provide...

> You shouldn't need nested jails for jail-to-jail networking, you 'just' need to set up the routing. Because Linux containers are a bit more [Lego block-like](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/containers-zones-jails-vms/), a really common pattern...