Serge Aleynikov

@jhartwell, if you can no longer maintain it I would be ok if you transfer the ownership of the project to me.

Chris, thanks for your work. I am including some comments based on my quick review of your code. 1. It's a little unconventional for the "catch all" handle_info/2 clause to...

Hi Cris, 1. From what I've seen in many production systems using Erlang was that an unhandled messages may result not only from wrong API, but in some cases when...

The more important question that I am struggling with is what is that gen_server wrapper giving us that is not available without it (especially that all other networking components gen_tcp/udp/sctp)...

Chris, Thanks for clarifying your goals. I also think that we have similar long-term visions for the erlzmq project. If we agree on the need to support one ZMQ context,...

#2. This request was made for two reasons: - To put the API in place for turning zmq into an application having default context (which is indeed what you acknowledged)....

Doing a quick look through the old/new zmq.erl reveals little differences in start_link/1 and socket/2. Is there more that users would need to be aware of when upgrading? Let me...

Chris, I see that you did changes reflecting our discussion. Are you still working on adding the active mode back (I don't see it in the commits)?

I checked with Elixir 1.14.0, and it seems like the struct and the type is properly generated, but the tests do fail.

This is fixed in my PRs #39 and #40.