Roman Penyaev

[the hostess took up the broom] @milan-zededa any thoughts on this? or we can close it?

@milan-zededa @giggsoff @eriknordmark Folks, do we still need the dnsmasq control over a socket? I assume @temerkhanov never tried to upstream the dnsmasq changes, so can be difficult to port...

out of the curiosity: what is the difference to the spdk approach: https://gerrithub.io/c/spdk/qemu/+/409094/1 ? or to the vhost-nvme in qemu: https://qemu-devel.nongnu.narkive.com/qwJ8pbxp/rfc-patch-0-9-vhost-nvme-new-qemu-nvme-backend-using-nvme-target#post1 ??

[the hostess took up the broom] @rvs do you plan to return to this or we can close it? and btw why "do not merge"? I try to go through...

[the hostess took up the broom] @rvs do you plan to return to this or we can close it?

> > [the hostess took up the broom] @rvs do you plan to return to this or we can close it? > > The problem was resolved in another PR:...

> I mean the PR may be closed all clear, thanks.

[the hostess took up a broom] @eriknordmark I think we can close this pr, because the statement "VMs/containers are fully controlled and nested virtualization is not in use" is not...

[the hostess took up a broom] @zededa-yuri do you plan to address comments from Milan and Erik and eventually finish this? or we can close it?

[the hostess took up the broom] @eriknordmark can we just close this? this looks like a total mess, original commits are lost after the trunk was diverged, barely possible to...