Ross Barnowski
Ross Barnowski
> Have you considered splitting while keeping blame? Thanks for the pointer @larsoner , this is definitely worthwhile ! I will give it a shot
AFAICT the test failures are not obviously related: the failures seem to be related to path formatting on windows for the validator. @stefmolin @mattgebert any idea what might be going...
> (or a dependency change in the action runner). Good observation - I opened #804 to test whether it was something in the runner environment - everything there runs as...
> I'm also at a loss for why these changes would cause the tests to suddenly fail on Windows. The only thing I can think of is that the proposed...
Now that #653 is in and testing gremlins are all chased down I intend to keep pushing this! The first order of business was taking up @larsoner 's excellent suggestion...
The binder button still works in the preview, though I'm not sure if there are other reasons to keep this around!
tl;dr - I'm -1 on removing parameter type descriptions from the standard. Projects that do not want to provide parameter type descriptions are already free to do so. --- IMO...
Again, the parameter type descriptions in the docstring are for humans... they can be whatever the docstring author thinks is most relevant for readers. Even in the case of simple...
Test failures coming from nbqa via linting: see nbQA-dev/nbQA#893
I will go ahead and close this as superseded by #7751 !