Ross Barnowski
Ross Barnowski
> Hello! I am so sorry to bother you No need to apologize @joyemang33 , we very much appreciate the work you're doing by finding & reporting these cases! Out...
Gentle ping @sourabh-sudesh-paradeshi
> for implementing the same functionality but faster with worse-quality results? There is precedent for a "method" kwarg that allows users to choose between implementations - see e.g. `steiner_tree` which...
> Thanks! This does work, but it definitely hurts readability (see https://github.com/networkx/networkx/issues/3912) and complicates some parts that would otherwise be simple set subtractions. I think what @boothby means is that...
Returning to the motivation for ordering - the output of the function is a set, so the output will inherently be unordered. Therefore I don't think there's any need to...
> I don't think this is a lazy_import problem. It is just an import problem. Thanks @dschult ! I agree - the first question to answer is: is the exclusion...
Chiming in here with another related use-case that no longer works in v3. In our lab's case, we're reading ZipStores from a central data server over SFTP via `sshfs`. Here's...
Thanks for reporting - it does indeed seem things are underspecified here, especially the tests - which only check that [the graph has `p` nodes](https://github.com/networkx/networkx/blob/2c2c3775efc05d398c519c5176f37202dac0d787/networkx/generators/tests/test_expanders.py#L33). The first question in my...
It looks like this was added in #1306 - any insights here @jfinkels ?
Looks fine to me, my approval stands!