Rob Scott

@evankanderson I agree that it would be nearly impossible for an implementation to recognize configuration they are not aware of and populate a "Unsupported" or "NotImplemented" condition based on that....

As suggested by @mikemorris in Slack, it seems useful to describe why we ended up [removing BackendPolicy](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/pull/732) earlier. Unfortunately we didn't leave much of a paper trail, but here's what...

I agree that these would be great improvements. As far as link anchors, I know @jpeach had looked into that earlier, and there's some discussion in https://github.com/ahmetb/gen-crd-api-reference-docs/issues/30. Maybe that's something...

Actually that was easier than expected, looks like anchors can be added with #1046.

>Move significant content generic to a resource (rather than specific to its field context) from the field description into the resource description itself. @mikemorris To clarify, do you mean that...

Thanks @youngnick! /lgtm

Hey @barnettZQG, thanks for the PR! Trying to understand how this integration works, could it be used with any Gateway API implementation or is it really just tied to Traefik?...

Hey @barnettZQG, I brought this up in today's community meeting, some notes: 1. We haven't clearly defined what qualifies something to be listed as an integration yet 2. We want...

Hey @gyohuangxin, thanks for checking! This is still unimplemented and would be a nice addition to https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api/blob/main/apis/v1beta1/validation/gateway.go. Let me know if you're still interested in implementing this.

Hey @gyohuangxin, sorry for the confusion here! This was actually intended to be smaller in scope than that. Instead of ensuring that a Listener's port, protocol, and hostname are unique...