Ruslan Hrabovyi

> the support for a certain feature was provided only in the latest release of the package I'm not sure to which feature do you refer. But assuming you are...

> you are saying if I made necessary changes in this PR, we can merge? yes. > are we planning to remove jQuery completely in v2? There is no such...

@mum-never-proud I'm not sure. I'd like us to be able to add such a feature by changing only `click-on-text` action, w/o touching any other layers of the ember-cli-page-object codebase, and...

> we make use of assertElementExists in almost all actions in ember-cli-page-object yes, but we aim to remove it in favour of `findOne` soon. see https://github.com/san650/ember-cli-page-object/pull/493/files#diff-64c0403b6dd8956dfe66fdde51ae86b5L94

Yes, there is such a limitation currently. I believe a good way to do it would be go play around [`getPageObjectDefinition(`](https://github.com/san650/ember-cli-page-object/blob/f999ebaa8425f9b075aa5ed37e9a24392b4beec5/addon-test-support/-private/helpers.js#L345). But: - that's private for now - even with...

I think it's more about ["definitions"](http://ember-cli-page-object.js.org/docs/v1.15.x/components#definitions). `components` are page object instances while defs aren't. I like the `fragments` name. However, I think they should provide a way to compose an...

I think integrating of the new `@ember/test-helpers` [`typeIn`](https://github.com/emberjs/ember-test-helpers/pull/397#issue-201443175) helper should resolve the issue. @mistahenry there is no public way to define a full featured custom action yet. You can keep...

Thanks for opening the issue and sorry for being so late here! 😅 I'm afraid a new API like action hooks can lead us a bit further from simlicity. As...

Using master, today it should be possible to do something quite close to what you are asking for: ```js import { fillable } from 'ember-cli-page-object'; import { run } from...

@artemgurzhii I think the feature can have sense for some apps. However, if you need to enable `fillIn` + `blur` for your `fillable`, I think someone would want this behavior...