Randy Döring
Randy Döring
I wonder if there is a good reason for this behavior or if it is just legacy behavior nobody had the courage to change? In other words, it might be...
> but this has never been so, these commands have always removed packages if they are under poetry control and they are not required by the action being taken >...
I think I understand what you want and I think it makes sense to me. However, there are some pitfalls: - `poetry lock` creates a new lockfile from scratch and...
The behavior in https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/9185#issuecomment-2047645186 is expected and does not show a final failure but just correct error handling: - start download of wheel - abort download because server says it...
There is already a `--license` option for `poetry init` and since #9088 also for `poetry new` (just in the main branch, not yet released). It just fills the metadata field...
> If I do poetry add without -E highlight, Poetry starts to remove highlight-related deps from my virtual env, which tells me -E specifies the set of extras to consider...
Probably relevant: #3113 (We have to take care not just to write another url but also make sure to consider it equal when reading it back otherwise we may always...
https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/8991#issuecomment-1974079665 https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/pull/8992#issuecomment-1974327864
pre-commit.ci autofix
> I'm not sure what to do about that one since it is a mocked out version of check_output. The warning comes from calling the original method so I suppose...