Pierre-Yves de Müllenheim

Results 7 comments of Pierre-Yves de Müllenheim

Hello, Potential reviewers could be the followings (based on their preferences regarding R and Shiny): * Ecosantos/ * PhilipPallmann * EDiLD * sandrinecharles * luciorq * elimillera * adithirgis *...

Thank you very much @angerhang for your comments. Before making the required changes to the package, I have some questions to be sure of what you want. 1. Regarding the...

Dear @samhforbes @angerhang @elimillera, CRAN has requested I make some updates of the package so that it passes R-dev checking (this is in relation with a planned update of R...

> > Thank you very much @angerhang for your comments. Before making the required changes to the package, I have some questions to be sure of what you want. >...

> Thanks again for your comments! I have provided answers for the two issues you have opened. Regarding the dependency instructions, I am not sure your comment above was done...

Thanks @elimillera for your time and work. Glad to know that all seem ok for you. @samhforbes, @angerhang, for information I have merged the dev branch with the master branch...

I did not know groundhog! I personnally use renv. After some minutes looking for some comparisons, I am not sure groundhog would be as good as renv. I am wondering...