[PRE REVIEW]: activAnalyzer: An R Shiny app to analyse ActiGraph accelerometer data and to implement the use of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD instruments

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @pydemull (Pierre-Yves de Müllenheim) Repository: https://github.com/pydemull/activAnalyzer Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.4 Editor: @samhforbes Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5d6659af1bf8ca2fb977c189039b8315"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5d6659af1bf8ca2fb977c189039b8315/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5d6659af1bf8ca2fb977c189039b8315/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5d6659af1bf8ca2fb977c189039b8315)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pydemull. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@pydemull if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.10 s (1026.1 files/s, 223194.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               68           1803           2113          11621
XML                              1              0            129           1589
Markdown                         6            207              0            824
TeX                              4             55              0            771
Rmd                             10            298            682            657
CSS                              2             62             16            274
YAML                             7             35              8            173
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            98           2460           2948          15909
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1135

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.10.005 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106353 is OK
- 10.1111/sms.14085 is OK
- 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000468 is OK
- 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000350 is OK
- 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318258cb36 is OK
- 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fc7162 is OK
- 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0213 is OK
- 10.1183/09031936.00004814 is OK
- 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101765 is OK
- 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214554 is OK
- 10.1093/gerona/53A.4.M275 is OK
- 10.1183/09031936.00183014 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0077036 is OK
- 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399dcc is OK
- 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001073 is OK
- 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.08.001 is OK
- 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0 is OK
- 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000737 is OK
- 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3 is OK
- 10.1183/09031936.00023214 is OK
- 10.2147/COPD.S214410 is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2014-024 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[pydemull]

Hello, Potential reviewers could be the followings (based on their preferences regarding R and Shiny):

• Ecosantos/
• PhilipPallmann
• EDiLD
• sandrinecharles
• luciorq
• elimillera
• adithirgis
• aj2duncan

Sincerely, Pierre-Yves de Müllenheim

---

De : The Open Journals editorial robot @.> Envoyé : mercredi 27 juillet 2022 13:50 À : openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc : Pierre-Yves de Müllenheim @.>; Mention @.> Objet : [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: activAnalyzer: An R Shiny app to analyse ActiGraph accelerometer data and to implement the use of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD instruments (Issue #4614)

Submitting author: @pydemullhttps://github.com/pydemull (Pierre-Yves de Müllenheimhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-7371) Repository: https://github.com/pydemull/activAnalyzer Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.4 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

[status]https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5d6659af1bf8ca2fb977c189039b8315

Status badge code:

HTML:

Markdown:

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pydemullhttps://github.com/pydemull. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@pydemullhttps://github.com/pydemull if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of peoplehttps://bit.ly/joss-reviewers have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbothttps://github.com/editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbothttps://github.com/editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4614, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APDYO2V2IC55E4UXWL5DA5TVWEPANANCNFSM54ZJ2L4A. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[arfon]

@pydemull - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot invite @samhforbes as editor

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry @oliviaguest, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only eics are allowed to do.

[oliviaguest]

haha, OK soon 😊

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot invite @samhforbes as editor

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry @samhforbes, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only eics are allowed to do.

[arfon]

@samhforbes – you can just say @editorialbot assign me as editor

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @samhforbes is now the editor

[arfon]

@editorialbot list editors

[editorialbot]

List of JOSS editors

@Bisaloo
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
@KristinaRiemer
@Nikoleta-v3
@VivianePons
@adi3
@ajstewartlang
@arfon
@bmcfee
@cMadan
@chartgerink
@christinahedges
@crvernon
@csoneson
@danasolav
@danielskatz
@dfm
@dhhagan
@diehlpk
@drvinceknight
@elbeejay
@eloisabentivegna
@emdupre
@fabian-s
@faroit
@fboehm
@fraukewiese
@galessiorob
@gkthiruvathukal
@hugoledoux
@jarvist
@jbytecode
@jedbrown
@jgostick
@jmschrei
@katyhuff
@kbarnhart
@kellyrowland
@kthyng
@kyleniemeyer
@leouieda
@lpantano
@lucydot
@luizirber
@majensen
@marcosvital
@martinfleis
@mbobra
@meg-simula
@melissawm
@mikldk
@oliviaguest
@osorensen
@pdebuyl
@pibion
@prashjha
@richardjgowers
@rkurchin
@samhforbes
@sbenthall
@taless474
@timtroendle
@vissarion
@xuanxu

[oliviaguest]

oh, wonderful!

[arfon]

@oliviaguest – you should have editorial superpowers now. Can you try @editorialbot assign @samhforbes as editor

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot assign @samhforbes as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @samhforbes is now the editor

[oliviaguest]

@arfon could I have done invite too?

[arfon]

Yep, invites should work now too. I just needed to add you to the joss-eics GitHub team.

[samhforbes]

Thanks for submitting to JOSS @pydemull. I have reached out to some prospective reviewers and they will be added here as they accept the invitation. I’m looking forward to working through this process with you.

[samhforbes]

Hi @adithirgis @elimillera @sandrinecharles would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html Please note this is a public issue, and your responses will also be public.

[elimillera]

Hey @samhforbes I can review

[samhforbes]

Thanks @elimillera we appreciate your expertise here. Will add you now.

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot add @elimillera as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@elimillera added to the reviewers list!

[samhforbes]

Hi @EDiLD @aj2duncan would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html Please note this is a public issue, and your responses will also be public.