Pavel Valena comments

Results 188 comments of


                                            Pavel Valena

work with @pvalena to create VM images out of Dracut PRs

Example of this possible future-state is this POC: https://github.com/rhboot/nmbl-poc/

nior4r requires Ruby version >= 2.3

@nidal2020 Could you try this PR? https://github.com/sclorg/ruby-ex/pull/37

fix(rngd): install system service file

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181540 Yeah, that was why I created this. To not update it / ship it further in the future. Sorry, I lost the reference - but will put it...

fix(rngd): install system service file

> Is it correct, that the test is only failing due to the different ENV var naming? @freswa Yes, I think so - `RNGD_OPTS` vs `RNGD_ARGS`. I can add both...

feat(hwdb): add hwdb module to install hwdb.bin on demand

Does someone know the reasoning of ``` - if [[ ! -r "${hwdb_bin}" ]]; then + if [[ ! -r ${hwdb_bin} ]]; then ``` - why is this (shfmt) change...

feat(hwdb): add hwdb module to install hwdb.bin on demand

> It seems that https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/blob/main/modules.d/01systemd-udevd/module-setup.sh#L33 and https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/blob/main/modules.d/00systemd/module-setup.sh#L137 installs hwdb regardless, so this PR does not make it on demand for systemd enabled initrd. Is that correct ? AFAIR think it's...

with systemd 256 dracut cannot write hooks to /lib/dracut/hooks during boot because /lib is /usr/lib, which is read-only with new ProtectSystem feature

If this is already fixed upstream, let's close this. For Fedora issues, please use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/.

with systemd 256 dracut cannot write hooks to /lib/dracut/hooks during boot because /lib is /usr/lib, which is read-only with new ProtectSystem feature

AFAIR, for Fedora, I have backported the fix to `dracut-101` already. (But I will upgrade dracut to v102 ASAP off course.)

RFC: Extend dracut with the ability to add a package to the generated initramfs

Ping me if you need some review / help with implementation or testing.

Automated plan split into subplans

The `automated` part aside which will be deduced from L1 (and therefore kind-of hackish), when gathered the conflicting requirements, there should be some resul / definition for L2, right?. Manually,...