Patrick Ziegler

> But in general, the proposal was about thinking into the direction of restoring the existing precision of calculation without the consumer having to bother with it. That will of...

Regardless of which approach is the best, I've created https://github.com/eclipse-gef/gef-classic/pull/840. From my understanding, this issue can be closed once those tests succeed, correct?

> Replace only specific instances, e.g. Figure#bounds with a PrecisionRectangle -> you won't cover everything, but it should help a bit I've played around with this for a bit and...

> Any operation on PrecisionRectangle is in the best case at lest 2-3 times slower then the normal Rectangle. And this only if we are fully reworking every operation in...

> I'm not sure if I expressed myself correctly: I always meant on draw2d side. I know, but I just wanted to give an example that would be just as...

This effectively prevents pinning/unpinning of the drawer figures, unless you hit the one pixel that is not underneath the scrollbar.

@azoitl What should we do about #805? I think it would be beneficial to have this included for the M1. I've already prepared a fix for the Zest tests, but...

Then let's merge everything. I think especially with such a delicate feature, early feedback will be invaluable. And if there are issues, people can always opt-out and get the original...

Sure. I'll trigger the job once everything is merged.

M1 has been contributed: https://download.eclipse.org/tools/gef/classic/milestone/S202510061831 https://github.com/eclipse-simrel/simrel.build/commit/9ff79e835aae1c0ed730f8e21582cc5f4ba117c3 Release record: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.gef/releases/gef-classic-3.26.0