Lennart Poettering
Lennart Poettering
OK, let's close this here. If there's still interest in this, please convince sysvinit people that this is desirable. If so, we can certainly copy their interface here too.
is it dead though? I mean, philosophically certainly. But there's a community still around: https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/sysvinit https://github.com/slicer69/sysvinit/ Last commit June 6 this year, last release Apr 26...
i'd be more comfortable maybe if after all we'd add that to "systemctl poweroff", i.e. `systemctl reboot --when=+5h`, and then leave `shutdown` alone. Then we are in our own territory...
> I have run-tested things with a policy that predates the revert. There are no new operations targeted and there are no new permissions added. There is one instance where...
from where i stand i can't really determine if anyone relies on these verbs being something or something else. I neither know selinux well enough nor how it's used IRL,...
So I read @bachradsusi's comments as a (weak) blessing that we can go ahead with this. Hence, please fix the code issues I pointed out above, then we can look...
@bluca dunno, the selinux policy people never acked this afaics. not really willing to go ahead with this without some input from them...
> So I read @bachradsusi's comments as a (weak) blessing that we can go ahead with this. Hence, please fix the code issues I pointed out above, then we can...
In light of this coment: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/10023#issuecomment-1179835586 from an upstream selinux person i'd prefer if we implement the suggested approach here properly too. Specifically: the `UnitFileInstallInfo` structure should have a `label`...