Lennart Poettering
Lennart Poettering
I still think we should do fnmatching only if `=$` or so is used, and otherwise do simple string compares on `=`
Hmm, I figure we should make `*/10 *-*-* 00:00` work too then?
> Hmm, I figure we should make `*/10 *-*-* 00:00` work too then? Hmm, or maybe not, because the "phase", i.e. the first day when to start the repeat cycle...
So, hmm, I think I like the syntax, in the sense that `xyz/r a-b-c d:e:f` would mean: find first point in time `xyz a-b-c` holds, then trigger at that time,...
Hmm, so I'd really like to discuss first how the syntax should be interpreted, i.e. what does this mean: ``` Mon,Tue/10 *-*-* 00:00 → ? */10 1-1-2021 00:00 → ?...
so if we go the way that the new addition just stupidly repeats events in some day interval after the first time it triggers, maybe it would actually make more...
so, here's another idea: there's an RFE somewhere to extend the calendar logic in .timer units with additional settings "NotBefore=" and "NotAfter=" which take explicit timestamp specifications (i.e. not repeating...
any update?
BTW, please include a commit in this PR that removes the relevant line from the TODO file in the git repo main dir: ``` * cryptsetup: if only recovery keys...