pgaudet

@kltm @dougli1sqrd @balhoff Can you have a look ? This is weird, I see the relation in protégé, but not in today's snapshot go-basic.obo Thanks, Pascale

@ValWood go-basic does not contain relations that go across aspects, see http://geneontology.org/docs/download-ontology/ I dont think we want to change this. Thanks, Pascale

> Are the MF-BP annotations only generated if there is not an existing annotation? I think so. @cmungall @kltm can you confirm ?

As thought the interontology links were used to make annotations that go in the 'prediction' files, for example for pombase: http://release.geneontology.org/2020-12-08/products/annotations/pombase-prediction.gaf But I dont see SPCC594.06c (one of the pombase...

Maybe we can set up a call also with @kimrutherford and @balhoff to look at that ? I dont understand where the issue is coming from.

I think @dougli1sqrd was working on the script that generated those?

Hi @ValWood Chatting with @cmungall @kltm - this code is older, unsupported code that actually needs to be replaced, so we need to prioritize this work with the new code...

Copy-pasting an e-mail exchange onto the ticket > I don’t think it is a good idea to obsolete these terms. The stress-activated signaling cascade is a well-known mechanism described in...

Thanks for the feedback. Can you point to a specific pathway that we could describe in the term definitions? I am happy to keep terms if they can be defined...

I am removing the 'do not annotate' check on [response to stress](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0006950), to allow capturing this as an extension. After discussion we agreed that while this term is quite general,...