pgaudet

Results 1551 comments of pgaudet

I will obsolete GO:0061992 ATP-dependent chaperone mediated protein folding GO:1990507 ATP-independent chaperone mediated protein folding since these really should be MFs. Only 6 annotations. This will complete the work on...

Dear all, The proposal has been made to obsolete GO:0097393 telomeric repeat-containing RNA transcription. The reason for obsoletion is that there is no evidence that any of this is functionally...

Note there there are children terms - * GO:0097394 telomeric repeat-containing RNA transcription by RNA polymerase II * * [regulates relation] [GO:1901580 regulation of telomeric RNA transcription from RNA pol...

Hi @RLovering For the two papers you cite: - for positive regulation of nc transcription: we already have a specific term for piRNA transcription: GO:0140543 positive regulation of piRNA transcription...

@krchristie you mean in GO terms ? Maybe we should discuss with editors, this sounds a lot like the sensu terms. Not that I mind, but I would like more...

We have a [ticket](https://github.com/geneontology/amigo/issues/56) to display this information in AmiGO, but right not we dont have any resources to work on AmiGO improvements Meanwhile, QuickGO shows taxon constraints ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4782928/177470891-ea8044f3-e94b-4ff4-9249-d63dac6801c3.png) =====>>>

+[Term] +id: GO:0000512 +name: lncRNA-mediated gene silencing +namespace: biological_process +def: "A post-transcriptional gene silencing pathway in which regulatory long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) elicit silencing of specific target genes, often miRNAs."...

@ValWood so I would also create 'co-transcriptional lncRNA-mediated gene silencing' for PMID:34389684?

@ValWood For the paper you describe (PMID:34389684), @RLovering @gantonazzo and I propose you use BPs: - GO:0060633 negative regulation of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II - and GO:0034244 negative...

Hi @ValWood > Right so there will be no terms for ncRNA-mediated gene silencing (presumably because the entity is a lncRNA so it unnecessary to capture this in a term?...