pgaudet

@slaulederkind There is one annotation that we don't agree with: RGD:3611 Rxrb is a dbTFF, but it's part of a complex, so sometimes the terminology used by authors is confusing....

Thank you ! I'll fix this

@ValWood You didn't want the product-specific terms.... This would create a very complex branch if we do all products x each polymerase. Also, do we always have the evidence for...

Hi @ValWood Should we change GO:1902802 regulation of siRNA-mediated facultative heterochromatin formation to positive? GO:1902802 has no annotations, and the 'neutral' terms are always confusing. Pascale

- [x] DisProt | UniProtKB:Q14457 | BECN1 | PMID:18797192: wrong gene annotated, should have annotated gamma-herpesvirus 68 Bcl-2 homolog M11 (UniProtKB:P89884???? ) - [x] GO:0039521 uniprotkb_kw2go UniProtKB-KW:KW-1083 Inhibition of host...

You mean they should be under 'proteinogenic'? If that's the case, you reported this 3 weeks ago here: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/28367 Should we close one as redundant?

No, the problem is the ph/.3 forms, see the other ticket: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/28367#issuecomment-2203300882

> obsolete homoserine catabolic process (unused) obsolete the unecessary grouping term homoserine metabolic process because it is no longer required (single inheritance) This makes sense.

You're right @edwong57 , just obsoleting the homoserine tersm will not address the incorrect non-proteinogenic parentage. I think we need to be more drastic and obsolete GO:0170039 proteinogenic amino acid...

Hi @ValWood This is great - but just to make it easier to follow, can we create a Google spreadsheet? With GO ID- term label - # annotations - #...