pgaudet

Yes - although there are about 1000 EXP annotations, so it's no that trivial. I suggest we start with 'regulation of protein targeting' - more than half are IMPs -...

Hi, Sorry about the delay in responding to your request. Based on the definition you propose, this term would be similar to 'GO:0020007 'apical complex'? > A group of cytoskeletal...

Seems like a binding function ? Only 4 EXP annotations.

This is similar to how nuclear import is describes: there are two 'steps': GO:0000061 protein import into nucleus, substrate release GO:0000060 protein import into nucleus, translocation (we should discuss this...

The same solution should also be applied to [prosthetic group metabolic process](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0051189) and [prosthetic group catabolic process](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0051190) This seems a tough one to keep up to date.

I dont think this is consitent with our rules. As @hattrill points out, for protein-containing complex the geneproduct2term relation is part_of, while for cellular anatomical strucutres, it's located_in or is_active_in...

That is indeed very entertaining :D Le jeu. 18 mars 2021 à 6:51 PM, Helen Attrill ***@***.***> a écrit : > And, just for fun - polysome is_a GO:1990904 ribonucleoprotein...

I put this to discuss with GO editors on out next call, Nov 15th.

@ValWood Because of the Geneproduct2term rules, **we cannot have both** 'cellular anatomical entity' and 'protein-containing complex' as parents of the same term. Another way to think about this may be,...

One very practical way to assess this is the reason why this came up: in GO-CAM, which statement do we want to make for a CC: - Complex enables some...