Pavel Penev

I think it's a pretty valid point to say that - The formation we use (like for Badgers in RA and A10s in TD) is nicer than the original line...

Unless someone is both willing and able to (because I'm willing, but I doubt the "able to" part) to implement proper formation flight when turning, I say we use that...

This PR should also probably address [this comment in the weapon definition](https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/blob/bleed/mods/d2k/weapons/other.yaml#L72).

@CarterWilliam I'm really sorry this has sat largely unnoticed for such an absurd amount of time. I am going to guess the raw volume of the changes *(and this being...

To give some context on the `Conceptual concerns` label (and also so I don't forget what we talked about): 

No, I consider this critical enough to fix before a release. Either I finish it or someone takes over.

IMO if the main problem is the checkbox being visible in the Settings window for mods that don't want it, we can just have `AudioSettingsLogic` check with `MusicPlaylist` and show/hide...

*(This is more of documentation for future PRs than a change request for this one, though! It is a very serious scope creep that shouldn't happen here.)* Also saboteurs should...

This is harder to test in the original than it is in OpenRA, but the AI doesn't even react to them when they start entering a building. And units' autotargetting...

The entering code and the cloaking code predate conditions, so currently no, but conditions + updating those two are the way to go, yes (not for this PR, ofc -...