pdeffebach
pdeffebach
Apologies for being so long delayed in fixing this. I have a PR #347 which fixed this problem.
Fixed in #347
Happy with `@with df @byrow ... end`
I'm coming around to this being a good idea. It would certainly cut down on lots of typing and it definitely seems to be true that 90% of commands are...
@bkamins I think it would only apply to row-wise operations, so grouping would in general be ignored. @nalimilan I'm not sure how that would work, are you saying something like...
> So the first assignment operation present in the block drops grouping. Yeah. It would drop grouping.
@jariji This isn't quite right. Even though, in Julia `sum([1, 2, missing])` returns `missing`, existing libraries don't treat `missing` strictly. Both Plots.jl and Makie.jl omit `missing` values in arguments before...
That doesn't address my point. Your example is about how to handle `missing` when it is part of a categorical vector. I am talking about how to make a plot...
@aplavin I would still say "ignore" is the correct word. Whether there a gap in the line or it is filled in is not super material to me. The point...
I want to re-emphasize that I explored the behavior of R, Python, Octave and *other* Julia libraries and all of them seamlessly create graphs with missing values. AlgebraOfGraphics.jl is the...