pdeffebach

I think thats the right move for sure. Two things. 1. Does 1520 change the awkward printing of each subdataframe? 2. Would there be any way to print something like...

This is the current output of `map(describe, g::GroupedDataFrame)` ``` julia> map(describe, g) GroupApplied{DataFrame}(GroupedDataFrame with 3 groups based on keys: :A, :B First Group: 2 rows │ Row │ a │...

Cool. Do you think you could bundle the printing PR with #1520? Or should we wait for that to be merged and see what to do. fwiw, `describe.(g)` actually works...

Sounds good when that is merged I will make a PR for printing of `map` and then we can tell users to use `map` for describe.

After #1520 and others, `map` doesn't have that awkward printing. ``` df = DataFrame(a = repeat(1:4, outer = 5), b = randn(20), c = randn(20) .+ 1) g = groupby(df,...

#1632 Addresses the general grouped printing function. `showall(map(describe, g))` has the correct behavior. The questions is whether it's too verbose for recommended use.

Now that #1632 has been merged, I wonder if we should change the way grouped DataFrames are printed in general. Should we default to showing 10 rows of however many...

That's what TexTables.jl does [here](https://jacobadenbaum.github.io/TexTables.jl/stable/easy_examples.html) with `summarize_by`.

I've been playing around with `describe` for a grouped data frame and this is the best one-liner It's still not pretty, maybe when metadata is added we can have something...