pdeffebach
pdeffebach
> So maybe just Advocate the use of one common syntax rather than two different ways of writing? Yes, this doesn't fully solve the problem, since `@mymacro a, b` is...
Thanks for filing the issue! I don't think it's worth adding a macro just for the sake of consistency with `@`. It seems redundant to have a `@` which doesn't...
Sounds good. I can start a PR adding this.
I had a good idea this week for more features, something like ``` df = @groubby df :a begin @transform :y = :x .- mean(:x) @combine :z = first(:y) end...
This not a bad idea. Maybe `@groupsubset` is a better name, though.
Added in #372
Fixed in #384
Maybe we need a "Gotcha's" section of the docs? Could be a good opportunity to beef up the docs before 1.0.
This is actually kind of complicated, because `subset df true` and `select df 1` have different meanings. Do we even want `select df 1` to work? What about `select df...
Added `@groupby` in [#373] (did not add the feature above though. We now have keyword arguments in #323)