Pier Luigi Buttigieg

I can see this happening, and of great utility to ontologies like SDGIO. This could work with our "hazard" semantics in SDGIO: a landscape of fear would be an environmental...

>It's basically "caused process" In most cases we've come across in SDGIO ('exposure to flooding', 'exposure to drought', etc) it does seem to boil down to the series of processes...

We'll create and maintain system in ENVO. I don't think it's vague at all. >'observatory system' seems to be better placed under 'processed material' (or device) anyway. This makes absolutely...

Seconded @ramonawalls This conversation always spirals off in several directions. From first principles: there are cases where people need to talk about the space itself, and cases where there's no...

I also see an argument that representational entities should be defined in a role-based (or capable-of-based) way. A character string on a screen is only data or information because we...

@ddooley > A general reference to a representation would be for example "This organism produced a representation of a situation with the intention that others could interpret that representation". Could...

@bpeters42 >You are introducing a distinct way of looking at representation / information etc. As you know, there are many different ways of thinking about that. Yes - every view...

@cmungall >In general my preference is not to commit to any one theory. An orthogonal approach here is for COB to contain a single very general class for information/ICE/RE and...

Happy to move this to core, but we should also keep a number of the high-level subtypes (chemical energy, kinetic energy, etc) in core too rather than farming them out....

We also have related classes in ENVO on the material level (liquid materials, solid materials, colloidal suspensions etc), leveraging PATO qualities. These are general enough to be in Core, and...