Paul Romano
Paul Romano
@eepeterson Correct, at the appropriate point we'll drop the compatibility module and just use the sparse array classes directly from scipy. Also thanks for pointing out those ones I missed...
Thanks for opening this @connoramoreno. I agree that the more general we can make it, the better!
Hi @connoramoreno and thanks for reporting this. What version of OCP do you have installed? And did you install cadquery through pip or conda? After digging a bit, I found...
Also noting that `_address` was added in [OCP 7.7.1](https://github.com/CadQuery/OCP/releases/tag/7.7.1.0)
I'm a little confused. The domains argument to `get_microxs_and_flux` should be a specific instance of `MeshBase`, not the `MeshBase` class itself.
I'm still seeing 504s sporadically, e.g., here's one that I just got: https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc/actions/runs/18198604615/job/51811431543
Here is one relevant snippet of code that would need to be updated: https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc/blob/1645e3bb8719e299a574bf4bac268691abab2f10/src/mesh.cpp#L1201-L1202 We would also need to change the checks on allowed values, and when the mesh is...
...which would fail currently. The problem is that the way we currently do this under the hood is by creating a model with a geometry based on that universe, but...