oskarth

Anything that comes to mind here @jm-clius @staheri14?

Right, this issue was more about at spec level :) https://github.com/libp2p/specs

Burning seems to fit quite well with the overall design, could this easily be incorporated into the existing registration contract? That way it comes as a "whole package" with stronger...

I.e. you deposit 100 units, 50 is burned and 50 goes towards the private key that is slashable. Something like that perhaps? "Half now, half later". This proportion can be...

1) I'm also confused about how the contract code was changed and reviewed, haven't seen this anywhere - @staheri14 do you know how this came to be? From my understanding,...

Also, how is this contract Waku 2 specific? As opposed to being generally useful for RLN.

@kgrgpg what's the state of this PR?

@easye I see no activity in this PR for last 3 weeks with several outstanding comments. What's going on?

Hi @TheBojda! Have you seen this spec regarding topic recommendations and rationale? https://rfc.vac.dev/spec/23/

What would be an example of a spec being considered "verified"? Of the options outlined, I'd do 2 or 3, assuming we do this.