oskarth

What is needed before this is ready for review / mergeable? What about being draft (does this even make sense given current state?) Does it reflect and capture all relevant...

I think it would it make sense to have a brief section on how this compares with PoW/Nakamoto Consensus and PoS/LMD-GHOST (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03052.pdf)? Similarities and differences, briefly. It should explain to...

Just looking briefly at https://www.notion.so/Consensus-cca3f5b9bed341219d1cfd027bea897c the first thing I see is a lot of helpful requirements regarding fast finality etc. This also might disqualify other mechanisms. I can't find the...

I think just hammering home the leader-less aspect and efficiency aspect of it and contrasting this with PoW/Nakamoto and PoS/LMD-GHOST would be useful. Can be a short paragraph, just so...

@easye What's the state of this PR, why hasn't it been touched in 3 weeks and why isn't it merged yet?

Update: this issue is largely backlogged for now, as it largely relies on decentralized file storage to be maximally useful.

Not a priority, we might even want to archive this spec...

Interesting, does this mean what libp2p is doing here with field names like `ControlGraft` https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/pubsub/gossipsub/gossipsub-v1.0.md is not really idiomatic? I wonder if we should be idiomatic w.r.t libp2p or protobuf......

It seems like this is largely a stylistic thing, but I'd be fine with us updating specs across the board be in line with protobuf style guide.

Can we make this issue a bit more tight with a clear problem description, proposed solution and acceptance criteria? Right now it is a bit all over the place and...