omar
I find it strange to name the `const char*` function with a `Chpt` suffix. I think the existing C functions should exist with the same name as always existed. And...
> This is difficult to achieve Well it seems like the only reasonable answer to this problem ihmo. > Not sure to understand Using suffixes is very polluting for anyone...
> So you want to change the postfixes as explained? No I think we should change the prefixes only. > But the main problem is in the overloadings management: If...
> Just pushed to string_view with the prefix naming strategy and char* -> Str, ImStr -> STR (for backward compability) Unless I'm misunderstanding something, renaming those functions means there is...
@sonoro1234 So that you know - when you make post and edit the answers afterwards we don't see the edits in e-mail notification. I generally only read message in e-mails....
Thanks for the details. I did indeed forgot that we need to add suffixes to handle the overloads.... > There are quite things that can be changed (ImGui prefix and...
> It is almost imposible for me not to edit messages, specially when they are large. The only solution would be to make a new post and delete the old...
Now renamed `ImStr` to `ImStrV` in the branch full history, sorry for the delay.
Will fix it to be consistent with other function pointer typedefs, sorry.
Wouldn't hurt to have it support, but I'll still push them so they are consistent with others. I think it's actually nicer to not have the `*` in there but...