Steve Myers
Steve Myers
The headline issue has been fixed. Can we continue the discussion on related issue of locking unbroadcast spent utxos in new or exist issues? ie bitcoindevkit/bdk#1669
❓ Should the whole nursery folder be removed since in-development work can be done in a fork/feature_branch ?
Since this is a refactor and won't break the `bdk_wallet` API I'm not going to assign it a milestone until we get together for a team backlog prioritization call.
Concept ACK since it looks like the only changes to the `bdk_wallet` beta API is renaming `start_sync_with_revealed_spks()` to `build_sync_with_revealed_spks()` and `start_full_scan()` to `build_full_scan()`. Though in general I'd like to keep...
> It is non-intuitive to me to have `SyncProgress` be a collection of `usize` fields. It seems as though you can "consume" the SPK and still have the request fail?...
The team is currently working on a refactor that will make the core bdk wallet more agnostic to which blockchain client is used, after this change is done an example...
Oops again, moved back.
We need a new release of `rust-electrum-client` and bump it on `bdk_electrum` to fix this.
This is fixed by #1751 which updated to https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/rust-electrum-client/releases/tag/0.22.0.
Which tool have you been using to analyze the usage ? Have you tried [twiggy](https://github.com/rustwasm/twiggy) ? I haven't used it but seems like the right tool to narrow down what's...