nimo23
nimo23
To make it clear: I know that the price of n (=closePrice of actual finished bar) can be different than n+1 (openPrice of next unfinished bar), especially for gap up/downs,...
>You took it in the wrong context. I am referring to the next open price for the trade execution price for a stratety that trades on the "on open". For...
Thanks again @phong-phuong for your clarification! Yes, we must use the `openPrice` of the next (finished) Bar instead of the `closePrice` of the current bar. I think, https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/984 is a...
>I've updated the criteria tests to continue to use the closing prices by setting bar series manager to use the execute on close model. But if we introduce a `ExecuteOnOpenModel`,...
@team172011 Please close this issue as you have already answered it correctly.
@team172011 please close issues like that in future with label "https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/labels/wontfix" instead of "completed" to make it easier to find "wontfix" problems in the future.
Related: https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/961
Related: https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/961#issuecomment-1515119151
@team172011 Can be closed because of https://github.com/ta4j/ta4j/pull/1016. I think the whole issue here is a **missunderstanding** on how to convert a `Number` as precise as possible to a `Num` representation....
Maybe, we can also add `RenkoBarAggregator`. However, it is currently unclear whether `TickBar` and `RenkoBar` will work overall with our indicators as they are, since our indicators are based on...